Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle motorist, sole witness
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeswitness testimony, official scientific investigation, case classification
The case records a discontinuous observation of a white, saucer-shaped phenomenon that was flat underneath and at low altitude, with a lack of information.
Claim #12596 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Discontinuous observation of a white, saucer-shaped phenomenon, flat underneath, at low altitude: lack of information.”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Summary
The observation occurred on June 11, 2014, at around 7:45 p.m., when a motorist driving alone reported seeing a fairly large white phenomenon at low altitude in the direction of the road.
Claim #12597 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“On June 11, 2014, at around 7:45 p.m., a motorist driving alone was surprised to see, at low altitude in the direction of the road (east or southeast), a fairly large white phenomenon.”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness compared the observed shape to a flying saucer that was flat underneath.
Claim #12598 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“He compared the shape he saw to that of a flying saucer that was flat underneath.”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness lost sight of the phenomenon behind trees and later saw it again several kilometers farther on as a tiny point in the sky.
Claim #12599 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Continuing on his way, he lost sight of the phenomenon, which was hidden by trees, but found it again a few kilometers farther on in the form of a tiny point in the sky.”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
Only one testimony was collected concerning the phenomenon.
Claim #12600 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Only one testimony was collected concerning this phenomenon.”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Description
The case record states that several hypotheses were put forward, including a possible misidentification of the Moon at its rising.
Claim #12601 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Several hypotheses were put forward (see the investigation notes). The hypothesis of a misidentification of the Moon at its rising was studied”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
The Moon-misidentification hypothesis was not formally validated because the observation lacked sufficient precision, including no direction during the final phase.
Claim #12602 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“However, the lack of precision (absence of a direction during the final phase of the observation) prevents formally validating the hypothesis of a misidentification of the Moon.”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
The case was considered too imprecise to be identified because it had average strangeness and low consistency, involving a single witness, no photograph, and late testimony.
Claim #12603 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“With average strangeness and low consistency (single witness, no photograph, late testimony), this case proved too imprecise to be identified.”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
The case is classified C due to the lack of precision.
Claim #12604 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This case is classified C due to the lack of precision.”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0002]] Description
The source lists the phenomenon type as lack of reliable information.
Claim #12605 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Lack of reliable information”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
The source lists the case classification as C.
Claim #12606 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification
C”
Source: ROYAN (17) 11.06.2014
// [[T0001]] Case details
