Earth File #1136 // SOURCED record

Reported observation of around twenty reddish-orange spherical objects at Saint-Sulpice-et-Cameyrac

A GEIPAN record states that a witness observed around twenty reddish-orange spherical objects moving in the sky; the objects reportedly disappeared behind houses in the town center. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed the observation as probably Thai lanterns released at the end of a private party, while noting that the hypothesis could not be confirmed due to the absence of other witnesses or reports.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 1136 // CH 05
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
C159-A48E-7889
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionSPHERE
FRED // QUICK TAKE // generated from Earth Record metadata
SPHERE
Saint-Sulpice-et-Cameyrac, Gironde, Aquitaine // Aug 3, 2014. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureWitness report 1 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionMoving in the sky, Disappeared behind houses in the town center
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedWitness observation, Official scientific UAP investigation
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)9 structured claim(s) location precision: locality Moving in the skyDisappeared behind houses in the town center
FRED // QUICK TAKEPart of the drawer closes; part of it does not. Annoying, but considerably more useful than pretending uncertainty comes in one size.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Yes. Those were ours: approximately twenty reddish-orange spherical units moving across the sky above Saint-Sulpice-et-Cameyrac on 3 August 2014. The witness report says they disappeared behind houses in the town center. GEIPAN classified the case B and assessed Thai lanterns from a private party as extremely probable, while noting that the hypothesis could not be confirmed. A reasonable administrative outcome. We filed the operation under “lanterns,” because your categories remain delightfully inexpensive.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
GEIPAN’s sourced Earth Record classifies this as B: a witness report of around twenty reddish-orange objects, probably Thai lanterns, though the explanation could not be confirmed. Fair enough. The filing problem is not that the proposed explanation is unromantic; it is that “probably” remains “probably,” even when twenty glowing objects make a respectable effort to look organized. Off the Earth Record, the Visitors are taking responsibility. Yes, yes—you finally noticed us. Unfortunately, this does not upgrade the human evidence, confirm our involvement, or alter the classification. It merely means another family outing has become my paperwork. Gorkon accounting will be delighted; they have been waiting years to bill someone for the lanterns.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
August 3, 2014
Where
Saint-Sulpice-et-Cameyrac, Gironde, Aquitaine
Morphology
SPHERE
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
PARTIALLY EXPLAINED

Why Fred Thinks This Case Matters

AlienBox comparative analysis from structured Earth Record fields // not a new source // not a change in evidence grade
Console archetype // Published-resolution comparison

Fred keeps this file near the top of the pile because the source also supplies a published resolution to compare against the original report. That combination makes the case useful for cross-archive comparison without changing its evidence grade.

The source record includes a published resolution field. AlienBox treats it as an attributed source assessment to compare with the original report, not as an AlienBox verdict.

What strengthens the record

  • 1 linked source document provide provenance for the Earth Record.
  • 9 claim citations tie extracted statements back to source excerpts or locators.
  • Recorded evidence context: Witness Observation and Official Scientific UAP Investigation.
  • The source record includes a published resolution: Probably Thai lanterns released at the end of a private party; the hypothesis was not confirmed..

What limits the record

  • No sensor type is recorded in the structured Earth Record.
  • The structured record does not establish multiple independent observers.
  • The current dossier is anchored to one source network rather than independent source networks.

What would help resolve it

  • Can the originating record establish an exact number of observers and whether their observations were independent?
  • Did any radar, infrared, optical, telemetry, or other instrument record the event, and is that material preserved?
  • Can the source establish a usable duration for the observation rather than only a date or narrative sequence?

Fred Says Go Here Next

Internal research paths chosen from this dossier's structured fields. Similarity is navigation, not corroboration.

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesWitness report
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typesWitness observation, Official scientific UAP investigation
The observation occurred on 03/08/2014.
Claim #12320 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“03/08/2014”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details, Observation date
The case is associated with Saint-Sulpice-et-Cameyrac, in the Gironde department of the Aquitaine region.
Claim #12321 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details heading
The case is classified B.
Claim #12322 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification B”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details, Classification
The source identifies the type of phenomenon as a Thai lantern.
Claim #12323 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Type of phenomenon Thai lantern”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0001]] Case details, Type of phenomenon
The witness observed around twenty reddish-orange spherical objects moving in the sky.
Claim #12324 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The witness observes around twenty reddish-orange, spherical objects.”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The objects disappeared behind houses in the town center.
Claim #12325 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The objects disappear behind the houses in the town center.”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
The source states that the observation suggests Thai lanterns and describes the hypothesis as extremely probable.
Claim #12326 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 96% extraction confidence
“extremely probable.”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
The absence of other witnesses or reports in the press or on the Internet prevents confirmation of the Thai-lantern hypothesis.
Claim #12327 // UNRESOLVED // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The absence of other witnesses or of any report in the press or on the Internet does not make it possible to confirm this hypothesis, although”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN classifies the case as B and describes it as a probable observation of Thai lanterns released at the end of a private party.
Claim #12328 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as “B”: probable observation of Thai lanterns released at the end of a private party.”
Source: SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 // [[T0002]] Description continuation
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
SAINT-SULPICE-ET-CAMEYRAC (33) 03.08.2014 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.