Earth File #113 // SOURCED record

Reported bright disk-like phenomenon near Ambert, December 2000

A later testimony reported that several members of the same family observed a very bright disk-like phenomenon in the sky on December 26 or 27, 2000, between 9:00 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. The testimony also reported movement, instantaneous disappearance, no particular noise, power outages, and television interference. The case page lists December 26, 2000; GEIPAN classified the case C as involving a lack of reliable information and stated that it could not be investigated because the precise date and time were unavailable and no police report had been filed at the time.
Source // GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive Earth record separated from alien editorial
FRED // CASE CONSOLE
SOL-3 // FILE 0113 // CH 08
CONTEXT VIEW // NOT SOURCE MEDIA
CASE FINGERPRINT
412E-10FD-A146
CLOCK // NOT PRECISE
WITNESS CONTEXT
Reported motionDISK
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEM // generated from Earth Record metadata
DISK
Auvergne, Puy-de-Dôme // Dec 26, 2000. The diagram on the left is a structured-record visualization—not a reconstruction, photograph, sensor return, or additional evidence.
INSUFFICIENT DATA CLOCK // NOT PRECISE GEIPAN / CNES UAP Case Archive
Witness pictureseveral members of the same family 3 interface marker(s) // not a headcount estimate
Motion traceReported motionmoved, disappeared instantaneously, no particular noise was reported
Sensor / evidenceNo sensor type statedlater testimony, official case-page date and regional classification
Fred's paperwork completeness8/9 fields // 89%
Interface completeness only // this score does not measure truth, evidence strength, or extraterrestrial probability
1 document(s)1 source node(s)8 structured claim(s) location precision: region moveddisappeared instantaneouslyno particular noise was reported
FRED // PLEASE DO NOT ENCOURAGE THEMMultiple witnesses are useful context. They still do not combine into a photograph when stacked carefully.
Fred case console // context visualization // not evidence
Visitor Transmission // AlienBox editorial layer
Your archive reports that, on December 26 or 27, 2000, several members of one family saw a very bright disk-like phenomenon near Ambert, with movement, instantaneous disappearance, no particular noise, power outages, and television interference. The date and time remain imprecise; GEIPAN classifies the case C—“lack of reliable information”—and says investigation was impossible. We were present only as observers. We did not cause the phenomenon, and we do not possess a more useful explanation. The paperwork remains undefeated.
Fred // Earth Records Liaison // AlienBox editorial layer
The later family testimony is striking, but the filing problem is doing most of the work here: the date remains uncertain, the time is broad, and no police report was made at the time. GEIPAN’s C classification—“lack of reliable information”—is therefore refreshingly exact. An unidentified disk is not thereby promoted to an extraterrestrial disk. We have all seen that paperwork trick before. Off the Earth Record, our internal note places the Visitors as observers only, not the cause; that still does not identify the phenomenon. It does, however, remind me of my Orinthian cousin Mivra Qel, who once tested a landing assist after two Sublight Lagers and gave “controlled descent” a generous interpretation. She has never met a restricted corridor she considered binding.
FRED // EXPENSE ACCOUNT DENIED

Buy Fred a Red Dwarf Stout

The Gorkon Outpost has again declined reimbursement. Voluntary support keeps AlienBox running and does not purchase influence over Earth Record conclusions.

EARTH CURRENCY BUY RED DWARF STOUT // $5 Secure checkout via Stripe // funds settle to Orange-Hat, LLC
DIGIBYTE // DIRECT TIP SCAN OR SEND DGB dgb1q9dw0cfzr22n2efrad7l8340na90nlptjnthq0s
OPEN DGB WALLET →
Suggested: 500 DGB // any amount welcome // blockchain confirmation monitor pending
SUPPORT POLICY // Support payments are voluntary and never influence Earth Record evidence ranking, factual conclusions, or editorial treatment. VIEW FRED'S EXPENSE ACCOUNT →
When
December 26, 2000
Where
Auvergne, Puy-de-Dôme
Morphology
DISK
Evidence authority
SOURCED
Resolution
INSUFFICIENT DATA

Earth Record // SOURCED

Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typesseveral members of the same family
Sensor typesNot stated
Evidence typeslater testimony, official case-page date and regional classification, official GEIPAN assessment
The case is classified as C.
Claim #1471 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Classification C”
Source: AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case is categorized under the phenomenon type "Lack of reliable information."
Claim #1472 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Phenomenon type Lack of reliable information”
Source: AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 // [[T0001]] Case details
A later testimony reported that, on December 26 or 27, 2000, between 9:00 p.m. and 10:30 p.m., several members of the same family observed a very bright disk-like phenomenon in the sky.
Claim #1473 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“Recent testimony (February 19, 2010) of an old observation: on December 26 or 27, 2000, between 9:00 p.m. and 10:30 p.m., several members of the same family observed a sort of very bright disk in the sky”
Source: AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
The testimony reported power outages and television interference during the observation.
Claim #1474 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“noticed power outages and interference on the television.”
Source: AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
The testimony reported that no particular noise was heard while the object was observed, that it moved, and that it disappeared instantaneously.
Claim #1475 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“No particular noise was heard while the object was being observed; it moved and disappeared instantaneously.”
Source: AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN states that the case cannot be investigated because it has no precise date or time and no police report was filed at the time.
Claim #1476 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“This old case, with no precise date or time and no police report filed at the time, makes any investigation impossible due to a lack of information.”
Source: AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 // [[T0001]] Description
The case page lists the observation date as December 26, 2000.
Claim #1477 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Observation date 26/12/2000”
Source: AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 // [[T0001]] Case details
The case page lists the region as Auvergne and the department as Puy-de-Dôme.
Claim #1478 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Region Auvergne Department Puy-de-Dôme”
Source: AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 // [[T0001]] Case details
FRED // PUBLIC DESK CHANNEL

Ask Fred About This File

Questions about the dossier get an Earth Record answer first, then Fred may add clearly separated off-record commentary.

Questions are conversation, not evidence. Fred cannot promote a claim, alter a citation, or improve a source tier because somebody asks nicely.

Related Cases

Source Documents

AlienBox displays translated titles when available. Canonical links always point to the original source.
AMBERT (63) 26.12.2000 FR // English display translation
ALIENBOX CLEARANCE // EARLY ACCESS
Receive new dossiers before the humans organize them.
Join the early-access list for new sighting dossiers, major archive drops, Fred's notes, Visitor confessions, and future Clearance-only research tools.
HUMAN COMPLIANCE NOTICE // Fred and Visitor transmissions are AI-generated AlienBox editorial layers. Earth Record claims are separately sourced and audited. Ask Fred conversations are contextual explanations, not new evidence. Foreign-language source material remains immutable in its original archive; English display/analysis translations are stored separately with provenance. Scanner graphics, flashes and alien silhouettes are interface design only.