Human-world claims below are kept separate from Fred and Visitor editorial/lore. Translation changes language, not evidence status.
Witness typessingle witness
Sensor typesvideo
Evidence typeswitness report, witness video, ISS orbital-data verification
The observation occurred in Rouen on 24 May 2023.
Claim #11746 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The sole witness to this phenomenon was in his garden in ROUEN (76) on 24.05.2023.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0001]] Description
The witness observed a large white luminous point moving silently, steadily, and in a straight line from northwest to southeast for approximately three minutes.
Claim #11747 // ATTRIBUTED CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“For approximately three minutes, he observed a UAP appearing as a large white luminous point, moving silently, steadily, and in a straight line from northwest to southeast.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0001]] Description
Only one report was collected for the case.
Claim #11748 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“Only one report was collected, as indicated above.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0001]] Description
A video was captured to strengthen the data collected.
Claim #11749 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 98% extraction confidence
“although there was only one witness, a video was captured to strengthen the data collected.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0001]] Description
GEIPAN determined that the physical and dynamic characteristics of the UAP were consistent with observation of the International Space Station.
Claim #11750 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“In this investigation, we demonstrate that the physical and dynamic characteristics of the UAP are consistent with those of the hypothesis being explored, namely observation of the International Space Station (ISS).”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
The point-like shape, color, and brightness of the observation were consistent with the ISS hypothesis.
Claim #11751 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The point-like shape, color, and brightness, comparable to those of a star, are entirely consistent with the hypothesis.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
The straight-line trajectory and constant speed were consistent with the ISS hypothesis.
Claim #11752 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The straight-line trajectory and constant speed also confirm this correspondence.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
The reported azimuths, maximum elevation, start time, and visibility duration corresponded to orbital data for the ISS observed from Rouen, according to verification with the CNES Space Surveillance Service.
Claim #11753 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The azimuths of appearance and disappearance, the maximum elevation, the start time of the observation, and the duration of visibility of the UAP were verified with the CNES Space Surveillance Service and correspond to the orbital data for the ISS observed from Rouen.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
The witness video confirmed the appearance and straight-line movement of the UAP, consistent with the ISS.
Claim #11754 // ASSESSMENT // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“The video made by the witness also confirms the appearance and straight-line movement of the UAP, consistent with the ISS.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
GEIPAN classified the case as A: observation of the ISS.
Claim #11755 // FACTUAL CLAIM // SOURCED // 99% extraction confidence
“GEIPAN classifies this case as A: observation of the ISS.”
Source: ROUEN (76) 24.05.2023
// [[T0002]] Investigation conclusion
